ABUJA – The five ‘rebel’ Governors that defected to the All
Progressives Congress, APC, yesterday, stalled hearing of the suit
before the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court seeking to declare
their seats vacant.
The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, had gone
before the high court, praying it to declare the seats of the five
Governors vacant following their defection to the opposition APC, and
order that the Deputy Governor or Speaker of the State Houses of
Assembly of the respective states, be sworn-in to replace the
defendants.
Those PDP urged the court to sack from office were
Governors Murtala Nyako of Adamawa State, Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi of
Rivers, Alhaji Magatakarda Wamakko of Sokoto, Alhaji Rabiu Kwankwaso of
Kano and Alhaji Abdulfatai Ahmed of Kwara state, who were listed in the
suit as 2nd to 6th defendants, respectively. Besides, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, was also cited as the 2nd defendant in the matter.
Presiding
Justice Gabriel Kolawole had on December 13 last year, granted an
ex-parte order that allowed PDP to serve all the relevant court
processes to the defendants through substituted means.
However, at
the last adjourned date, January 27, the party, told the court that it
found it difficult to reach any of the defendants, even as it pleaded to
be allowed to paste the processes at the National Secretariat of the
APC situated at No 6 Guinea Bissau street, Wuse Zone 6, Abuja, as well
as publish the hearing notice on two national dailies, an application
that was granted.
Meantime, though all the affected governors
appeared in court yesterday, they challenged the powers of the court to
proceed with hearing the substantive suit against them, contending that
PDP failed to properly serve them the court processes. Maintaining
that their appearance in court yesterday was in protest, the governors
said they only saw the hearing notice in the Newspapers.
Consequently,
the defendants, through their various lawyers, took turns yesterday to
challenge the purported service of the originating summons on them by
the PDP. Spirited effort by a team of three Senior Advocates of
Nigeria, SANs, that represented PDP to persuade the court to allow them
to serve the court processes on the governors inside the courtroom
yesterday proved abortive as their lawyers declined to accept the
papers, saying their clients did not give them such mandate.
Lead
counsel to the PDP, Dr Alex Iziyon, SAN, explained that the bailiff went
to paste the hearing notice only to discover that APC has moved its
National Secretariat to another place.
“My Lord, at the time of
filing this suit, the National Secretariat of the APC was at No 6 Guinea
Bissau street, Wuse Zone 6, but the bailiff upon discovering that the
address has changed, used his own initiative and decided to go and paste
the court order at the new address at No 40 Blantyre street at Wuse 2.
“My
Lord the contention of the 2nd to 6th defendants is that they were not
served at the address specifically mentioned in the order. This is a
clear strategy to frustrate hearing on this matter. They are here
already. I’ll plead that since they are insisting that they do not have
the relevant court processes, we can serve it to them through their
counsels, or if they insist, we can go back to the former address of the
APC and paste the order”, Iziyon pleaded.
Sequel to refusal by
all the SANs that appeared for the defendants yesterday to accept the
court papers on behalf of their clients, PDP, applied for a short
adjournment to enable it regularize service.
In a short ruling,
Justice Kolawole, who stressed that the issue of service is a
fundamental threshold matter that bothers on jurisdiction, held that
under the rules of the court, PDP, was entitled to a period of 42 hours
to respond the contention of the governors.
He therefore adjourned
the case till February 24 for mention on report of service and argument
on the motion by the governors challenging the action of their former
party with regards to pasting of hearing notice for them at the APC
National Secretariat.
PDP had in the substantive suit, maintained
that going by the express provisions of sections 177 (c), 221 and 222
(c) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the court,
ought to declare that the Governors are ineligible to remain in office
having defected to the APC.
It is seeking “A declaration that by
the combined provisions of section 177 (c), 221 and 222 (c) of the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) the
2nd – 6th Defendants who were elected under the platform of the
plaintiff cannot continue to enjoy the mandate given to the plaintiff by
the people / electorate of the respective states as the 2nd – 6th
Defendants have defected to the All Progressive Congress (APC).
“A
declaration that in the absence of any division known and recognized by
law in the Plaintiff, the 2nd – 6th Defendants who were elected under
the plaintiff’s platform have vacated or forfeited their seats forthwith
upon their defection to All Progressive Congress (APC).
“A
declaration that having combined provisions of section 87 of the
Electoral Act 2011 (as amended), section 177 (c), 221 and 222 (c) of the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) the
2nd – 6th Defendants defection from the Plaintiff to the All Progressive
Congress (APC), the offices of the 2nd – 6th Defendants have reverted
to the Plaintiff.
“A declaration that by combined provisions of
section 177 (c), 221 and 222 (c) of the Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) upon the defection of the 2nd –
6th Defendants defection from the Plaintiff the All Progressive Congress
(APC), the mandate reverts to the deputy Governor or speaker of the
State Houses of Assembly of the respective states or any officer next in
rank who is still a member of the Plaintiff, to function and assume the
office of the Governor of the respective states in question.
As
well as “A declaration that by the combined provisions of sections 177
(c), 221 and 222 (c) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the act of defection by the 2nd – 6th
defendant from the PDP under whose platform they were elected to APC
amounts to gross misconduct.”
Besides, PDP is also asking for an
order of the high court mandating / directing the State Houses of
Assembly of Adamawa, Rivers, Sokoto, Kano and Kwara, to forthwith,
commence impeachment proceedings against the 2nd – 6th defendants.
Friday, February 7, 2014
Home
/
Defection: 5 ‘rebel’ Govs stall hearing of PDP’s suit
/
World News
/
Defection: 5 ‘rebel’ Govs stall hearing of PDP’s suit
Defection: 5 ‘rebel’ Govs stall hearing of PDP’s suit
Reliable Click
Provides the best online information news...
World News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment